The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6531•Clarence S. Gregory v. ROBERT E. WARD, Regional Director
03-6531Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 19, 2003
* This opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6531
CLARENCE S. GREGORY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT E. WARD, Regional Director; DORIS
GANTT, Correctional Officer; THIERRY D.
NETTLES, Captain; MARGUERITE TOMASINO,
Investigator; LINDA BOWMAN, Correctional
Officer; MARK COTE, Lieutenant Correctional
Officer; CHARLES WHITTEN, Captain and
Correctional Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(CA-02-44-3-25BC)
Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 19, 2003
Before LUTTIG and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. *
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Clarence S. Gregory, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Senn,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Clarence S. Gregory appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Gregory v. Ward, No. CA-02-44-3-25BC (D.S.C. Feb. 26, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.