United States of America v. Ortez Antoinne Propst

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6517
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ORTEZ ANTOINNE PROPST,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CR-91-119, CA-01-60-3-2-MU)
Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 18, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ortez Antoinne Propst, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ortez Antoinne Propst seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Propst, Nos. CR-91-119; CA-
01-60-3-2-MU (W.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --