The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6511•Joseph Samuel Revels v. IRA SHOCKLEY, Warden
03-6511Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 18, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6511
JOSEPH SAMUEL REVELS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
IRA SHOCKLEY, Warden and others; ATLANTIC
GENERAL HOSPITAL and others,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-3549-1-WMN)
Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 18, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Samuel Revels, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bock Karpinski,
ALLEN, KARPINSKI, BRYANT & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland; Curtis Henry
Booth, COWDREY, THOMPSON & KARSTEN, Annapolis, Maryland; Stephen B.
Awalt, JENKINS & AWALT, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Samuel Revels appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Revels v.
Shockley, No. CA-02-3549-1-WMN (D. Md. Mar. 13, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.