Christopher J. Moltz v. Ronald J. Angelone

03-6477Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2003

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6477
CHRISTOPHER J. MOLTZ,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-02-397-2)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 29, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher J. Moltz, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* Our review of the record reveals that Moltz was convicted of
murder, robbery, and conspiracy to commit robbery, not as an
accessory after the fact of murder, as stated in the district
court’s opinion.
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher J. Moltz seeks to appeal the district court’s
order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(2000).* We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
that Moltz has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 123
S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)
(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.