The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6448•United States of America v. Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora
03-6448Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 4, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6448
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILFREDO GONZALEZ LORA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CR-98-358-A)
Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 4, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motions for a copy of a government witness’ presentence
report, for reconsideration, and for recusal of the district court
judge. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Lora, No. CR-98-358-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 2, 2002; Feb. 4, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.