The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6415•Troy Goodman v. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. CA-02-1370-2
03-6415Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 28, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6415
TROY GOODMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BRIAN A. ABRAHAM, Prosecuting Attorney;
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Elizabeth V. Hallanan,
Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1370-2)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 28, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troy Goodman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Troy Goodman appeals the district court’s order accepting the
report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying his
petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Goodman v. Abraham, No. CA-02-
1370-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 4, 2003). We grant Goodman leave to proceed
in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.