The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6408•United States of America v. Cyrus Jonathan George
03-6408Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 4, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6408
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CYRUS JONATHAN GEORGE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CR-90-78)
Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 4, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cyrus Jonathan George, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Edward Johnston,
United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cyrus Jonathan George appeals the district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part his motion to alter or amend
his sentence. We have independently reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. George, No. CR-90-78
(N.D.W. Va. Feb. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.