The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6320•Napoleon Goodson, Iv v. SMITH, Warden; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
03-6320Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 22, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6320
NAPOLEON GOODSON, IV,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
J. V. SMITH, Warden; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-02-2488-0)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 22, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Napoleon Goodson, IV, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Napoleon Goodson, IV, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Goodson v. Smith, No. CA-
02-2488-0 (D.S.C. Dec. 26, 2002 and Jan. 31, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.