The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6311•Dwayne Moore v. Department of Corrections
03-6311Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 5, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6311
DWAYNE MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; D. STILL, Sergeant;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SHULER, Security;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GILLY, Security,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.
(CA-03-68-7)
Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 5, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwayne Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Moore appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, his motion to reconsider
that order, and the denial of his motion for summary judgment which
was filed after the case was closed. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Moore v. Dep’t of Corr.,
No. CA-03-68-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.