The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6309•United States of America v. Joseph William Alfred, a/k/a Butter
03-6309Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 30, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6309
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH WILLIAM ALFRED, a/k/a Butter,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-01-827)
Submitted: May 20, 2003 Decided: May 30, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph William Alfred, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph William Alfred appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to inspect grand jury minutes. Because Alfred
failed to show a particularized need to inspect the grand jury
minutes, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See In re
Grand Jury Proceedings, 800 F.2d 1293, 1298 (4th Cir. 1986). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.