The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6276•Larry L. Stewart v. W.B. RABORG, State Police/Trooper
03-6276Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 17, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6276
LARRY L. STEWART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W.B. RABORG, State Police/Trooper,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 03-6567
LARRY L. STEWART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W.B. RABORG, State Police/Trooper,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-03-41-AM)
Submitted: September 11, 2003 Decided: September 17, 2003
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry L. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Larry L. Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Stewart v. Raborg, No. CA-03-41-AM (E.D. Va.
filed Jan. 21, 2003 & entered Jan. 27, 2003; filed Mar. 10, 2003 &
entered Mar. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.