The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6258•United States of America v. John Lee Boyd, Jr
03-6258Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 1, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6258
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOHN LEE BOYD, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CR-93-123-5-F, CA-00-220-7-F)
Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: April 1, 2003
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Lee Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Lee Boyd, Jr., appeals from the district court’s orders
denying his “Notice of Motion to Dismiss Indictment Pursuant to
Fed. R. Crim. Rule 12(b)(2)” and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Boyd, Nos. CR-93-123-F-5; CA-
00-220-7-F (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 13, 2002 & entered Sept. 16, 2002;
Oct. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.