The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6217•United States of America v. Kyle Joseph Momon, a/k/a Moo-Moo, a/k/a Cow, a/k/a Calvin Flavor, a/k/a Flavor-Flave
03-6217Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 5, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6217
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KYLE JOSEPH MOMON, a/k/a Moo-Moo, a/k/a Cow,
a/k/a Calvin Flavor, a/k/a Flavor-Flave,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CR-92-70-4-1-BO)
Submitted: April 16, 2003 Decided: May 5, 2003
Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kyle Joseph Momon, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kyle Joseph Momon appeals the district court’s order denying
his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion to modify his sentence. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States
v. Momon, No. CR-92-70-4-1-BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.