United States of America v. Michael Antonio Goodman

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6216
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL ANTONIO GOODMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,
Chief District Judge. (CR-92-1-BO)
Submitted: August 27, 2003 Decided: September 25, 2003
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Antonio Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Antonio Goodman appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion fo return of property. Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e).
We have reviewed the record and found no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the district court’s reasoning. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United
States v. Goodman, No. CR-92-1-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --