The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6175•Joshua Bernard Johns v. Commonwealth of Virginia
03-6175Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 6, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6175
JOSHUA BERNARD JOHNS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-02-1687-A)
Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 6, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joshua Bernard Johns, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joshua Bernard Johns appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Johns v. Virginia, No. CA-02-1687-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 13,
2002). We deny Johns’ motion for general relief. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.