The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6118•Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr v. MARIO MOORE, Prisoner
03-6118Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6118
ROBERT ANDREW BARTLETT, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARIO MOORE, Prisoner; RICHARD FRYE, Sheriff;
TODD DAVIS, Captain; MARK DODSON, Sergeant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-00-482-1)
Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 31, 2003
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. David Iverson Smith,
ALAMANCE COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Graham, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Andrew Bartlett, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bartlett
v. Moore, No. CA-00-482-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.