The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6094•Brian Anthony Boyd v. Officer Bell
03-6094Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6094
BRIAN ANTHONY BOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICER BELL; EDDIE PEARSON, Warden; RONALD
ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of
Corrections; DAVID EVERETTE, Security Warden;
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; OFFICER
BANKS; OFFICER KENNON; HOUSTON L. SHIFFLETT;
JOHN DOE; JANE DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-01-1745-AM)
Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 31, 2003
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian Anthony Boyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brian Anthony Boyd appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Boyd v. Bell, No.
CA-01-1745-AM (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 2, 2002 & entered Dec. 5, 2002).
We deny Boyd’s motion for a transcript at government expense as the
district court did not conduct a hearing. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.