The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6093•William A. Veney v. Thomas C. Younce
03-6093Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 23, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6093
WILLIAM A. VENEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS C. YOUNCE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-1172-7)
Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 23, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Veney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William A. Veney appeals the district court’s orders denying
his request for injunctive relief and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Veney v. Younce, No. CA-02-1172-7 (W.D. Va. Dec. 4, 2002;
Jan. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.