The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6092•Wayne D. Green v. J. SACCHET, Warden
03-6092Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 2, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6092
WAYNE D. GREEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. SACCHET, Warden; SERGEANT TEACH; L. INGRAM,
Corrections Officer; R. MILLS, Corrections
Officer; L. WATERS, Warden, Maryland
Correctional Institute-Hagerstown,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-1835)
Submitted: April 15, 2003 Decided: May 2, 2003
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne D. Green, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wayne D. Green appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Sacchet, No. CA-
02-1835 (D. Md. filed Dec. 10, 2002; entered Dec. 12, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.