The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6035•David Graham v. JAMES B. ROBBINS, Judge
03-6035Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 15, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6035
DAVID GRAHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES B. ROBBINS, Judge; PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT; LOUVENIA STREET,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-1619-AM)
Submitted: April 23, 2003 Decided: May 15, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Graham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Graham appeals the district court’s order dismissing
Graham’s amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Graham v. Robbins, No. CA-02-1619-AM (E.D.
Va. Dec. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.