The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-6006•United States of America v. Jimoh A. Badmus
03-6006Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6006
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JIMOH A. BADMUS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CR-91-453-1)
Submitted: May 14, 2003 Decided: May 29, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John O. Iweanoge, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF JOHN O. IWEANOGE, P.A.,
Rosslyn, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States
Attorney, Stephanie L. Bibighaus, Assistant United States Attorney,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jimoh A. Badmus appeals the district court’s order denying his
petition for a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Badmus,
No. CR-91-453-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.