The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-4433•United States of America v. John David Mooney
03-4433Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 22, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4433
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOHN DAVID MOONEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (CR-02-231)
Submitted: October 22, 2003 Decided: March 22, 2004
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
W. Michael Frazier, FRAZIER & OXLEY, L.C., Huntington, West
Virginia, for Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney,
Miller A. Bushong III, Assistant United States Attorney,
Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
John David Mooney pled guilty to possession of a firearm
by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(a)(2)
(2000). On appeal, he alleges that the district court erred by
denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We do not find
that the district court abused its discretion in denying Mooney’s
motion to withdraw. United States v. Ubakanma, 215 F.3d 421, 424
(4th Cir. 2000). Thus, we affirm. We also deny Mooney’s motion to
stay case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.