The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-4056•United States of America v. Tom Chan
03-4056Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4056
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TOM CHAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 03-4057
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM CHAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CR-01-290)
Submitted: August 26, 2003 Decided: October 24, 2003
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John A. Dusenbury, Jr., Assistant Federal Public Defender,
Greensboro, North Carolina; Michael W. Patrick, Chapel Hill, North
Carolina, for Appellants. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States
Attorney, L. Patrick Auld, Assistant United States Attorney,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Tom Chan and William Chan appeal the district court’s orders
affirming their convictions and sentences. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Chan,
No. CR-01-290 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.