The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-2503•Stan Laber v. DONALD RUMSFELD, United States Secretary of Defense
03-2503Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 21, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2503
STAN LABER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DONALD RUMSFELD, United States Secretary of
Defense,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-03-170-A)
Submitted: April 30, 2004 Decided: May 21, 2004
Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stan Laber, Appellant Pro Se. Steven E. Gordon, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Stan Laber appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgement to the Defendant on Laber’s employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Laber v. Rumsfeld, No. CA-03-170-A (E.D.
Va. Oct. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.