The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-2483•Glenda Gail Parker v. U.s. Department of Defense
03-2483Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 14, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2483
GLENDA GAIL PARKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CA-03-431-A)
Submitted: April 30, 2004 Decided: May 14, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Glenda Gail Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Steven E. Gordon, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Glenda Gail Parker appeals the district court’s order
dismissing for want of jurisdiction Parker’s action challenging her
removal from employment and raising other claims. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Parker v.
Department of Def., No. CA-03-431-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 27, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.