Ahmad Falgou v. INS, 146 F.3d 227, 231 4th Cir. 1998 . Accordingly, we deny the

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2477
AHMAD FALGOU,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A72-165-765)
Submitted: April 21, 2004 Decided: May 7, 2004
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ahmad Falgou, Petitioner Pro Se. Allen Warren Hausman, Michele
Yvette Francis Sarko, Emily Anne Radford, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ahmad Falgou, a native and citizen of Iran, seeks review
of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming
without opinion the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) determination that he
is removable, declining to grant him another continuance, and
finding that he has effectively abandoned his asylum claim by
failing to complete the application. Upon our review, we conclude
that the administrative record supports the IJ’s finding that
Falgou is removable. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2000). In
addition, we find no abuse of discretion in the IJ’s decision to
decline to further continue Falgou’s case. See Onyeme v. INS, 146
F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir. 1998).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We further
deny as moot Falgou’s motions for release and for clarification
regarding his missing/lost properties, and we dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --