Neighborhood Development Collaborative v. Morton L. Ginsberg

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2412
NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COLLABORATIVE,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MORTON L. GINSBERG,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 04-1060
DAVID F. ALBRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT COLLABORATIVE,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
and
MORTON L. GINSBERG,
Defendant.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-
1552-1-AMD)
Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: July 22, 2004
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David F. Albright, ALBRIGHT & GOERTEMILLER, L.L.C., Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellants. Thomas N. Biddison, Paul S. Caiola,
GALLAGHER, EVELIUS & JONES, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In Appeal No. 03-2412, Morton L. Ginsberg appeals the
district court’s order denying his motion to dismiss for lack of
personal jurisdiction and granting summary judgment in favor of
Neighborhood Development Collaborative (“NDC”) in NDC’s declaratory
judgment action. Ginsberg also appeals the court’s order denying
his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). In Appeal No.
04-1060, Ginsberg’s attorney, David F. Albright, appeals the
district court’s order imposing sanctions against him in the form
of a reprimand. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the joint
appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Neighborhood Dev.
Collaborative v. Ginsberg, No. CA-03-1552-1-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 2,
2003; Oct. 7, 2003; Nov. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --