Timothy Boykin v. Stone, 958 F.2d 584, 590 4th Cir. 1992 . However, because we conclude that Boykin…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2358
TIMOTHY BOYKIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORMAN Y. MINETA, Secretary, Department of
Transportation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CA-03-477-A)
Submitted: March 24, 2004 Decided: April 13, 2004
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Boykin, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, Francis Patrick
King, Office of the United States Attorney, Dennis Carl Barghaan,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

*To the extent the district court dismissed Boykin’s
retaliation claim on the basis that it was not exhausted, we note
that exhaustion is not required with regard to retaliation claims
like the one at issue here. See Nealon v. Stone, 958 F.2d 584, 590
(4th Cir. 1992). However, because we conclude that Boykin fails to
support his claim of retaliation, the district court’s judgment
need not be disturbed.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Boykin appeals the district court’s order
awarding summary judgment to Defendant in this employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the
reasoning of the district court. * See Boykin v. Mineta, No.
CA-03-477-A (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 29, 2003 & entered Sept. 3, 2003).
We grant the Government’s motion to strike Boykin’s attachments to
his informal brief, and we deny Boykin’s motion to supplement the
record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --