The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-2291•Ephraim U. Etokie v. the Disability Action Center, Incorporated
03-2291Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 27, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2291
EPHRAIM U. ETOKIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE DISABILITY ACTION CENTER, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-1701-3)
Submitted: January 15, 2004 Decided: January 27, 2004
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ephraim U. Etokie, Appellant Pro Se. Herbert E. Buhl, III,
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ephraim U. Etokie appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge granting
summary judgment to his former employer in his civil action
alleging discrimination under various statutes. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Etokie v. The Disability
Action Ctr., Inc., No. CA-02-1701-3 (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.