The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-2234•Sunny O. Ekokotu v. Bundy American Corporation
03-2234Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2234
SUNNY O. EKOKOTU,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BUNDY AMERICAN CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-03-
1258-AMD)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: March 5, 2004
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sunny O. Ekokotu, Appellant Pro Se. Maurice Michael LaPlaca, Jr.,
Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Sunny O. Ekokotu appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to vacate the arbitrator’s award. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ekokotu v.
Bundy American Corp., No. CA-03-1258-AMD (D. Md. Sept. 22, 2003).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.