The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-2185•William A. Gaskins, Jr v. Pruco Securities Corporation, a subsidiary of Prudential Insurance Company of America
03-2185Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 24, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2185
WILLIAM A. GASKINS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PRUCO SECURITIES CORPORATION, a subsidiary of
Prudential Insurance Company of America,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.
(CA-02-2709-BEL-1)
Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Gaskins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Bryan David Bolton, Hugh
Michael Bernstein, FUNK & BOLTON, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
William A. Gaskins, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment in favor of Pruco Securities Corp.,
and denying Gaskins’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gaskins v. Pruco
Sec. Corp., No. CA-02-2709-BEL-1 (D. Md. Sept. 16, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.