The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-2157•Al Maajid Muhammad El, on behalf of his two minor children, Hasan Muhammad El v. Maryland State Board of Law Examiners
03-2157Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 4, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2157
AL MAAJID MUHAMMAD EL, on behalf of his two
minor children, Hasan Muhammad El and Ashanti
Muhammad El,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARYLAND STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
03-2366-1-CCB)
Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 4, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Al Maajid Muhammad El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Al Maajid Muhammad El appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and RICO complaints under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find the appeal fails to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Muhammad El v. Maryland State Bd. of Law Exam’rs., CA-
03-2366 (D. Md. Aug. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.