The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-2047•Stewart B. Allen v. Tedesia Edwards
03-2047Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 3, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2047
STEWART B. ALLEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TEDESIA EDWARDS; DEBORAH FALDUTI; ROBERT
MURPHY, Service Manager of DARCARS; CHARLIE
PARKER; DARCARS TOYOTA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
02-2921-DKC)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 3, 2003
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stewart B. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. John Paul Lynch, Gina Jun,
MCNAMEE, HOSEA, JERNIGAN, KIM, GREENAN & WALKER, P.A., Greenbelt,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stewart B. Allen appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Allen v. Edwards, No. CA-
02-2921-DKC (D. Md. filed Aug. 18, 2003; entered Aug. 20, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.