Christopher Langdon v. T. L. Malone

03-2001Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 25, 2004

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2001
CHRISTOPHER LANGDON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
T. L. MALONE; JERRY BREWER; ED GREEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-189-5-BO)
Submitted: December 18, 2003 Decided: March 25, 2004
Before LUTTIG, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Langdon, Appellant Pro Se. Roy Cooper, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Robert
Orr Crawford, III, Lisa Carol Glover, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Langdon appeals from the district court’s
order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order dismissing his
civil action. Our review of the record discloses no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Langdon v. Malone, No. CA-02-189-5-BO
(E.D.N.C. filed July 25, 2003 & entered July 26, 2003). We deny
the Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We deny Langdon’s motions:
(1) to file a supplemental informal brief out of time, (2) to stay
the appeal, (3) for sanctions, (4) for appointment of counsel, (5)
to consolidate, and (6) for an extension of time to file a response
to the Appellees’ motion for sanctions. We also deny Langdon’s
motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.