The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1976•Thomas Oliva v. State of Maryland
03-1976Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1976
THOMAS OLIVA; LOUIS J. DE MAIO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
03-1936-JFM)
Submitted: November 6, 2003 Decided: November 20, 2003
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Oliva, Louis J. De Maio, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Oliva and Louis J. De Maio appeal the district court’s
order dismissing their complaint alleging civil violations of the
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act under 18 U.S.C.
§ 1961 (2000), et seq. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Oliva v. Maryland, No. CA-03-1936-JFM (D.
Md. July 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.