Phyllis Filoso v. Prince William County School Board

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1943
PHYLLIS FILOSO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-02-1385-A)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 3, 2003
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phyllis Filoso, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Ellen McGowan, SICILIANO,
ELLIS, DYER & BOCCAROSSE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* We deny the Appellee’s motion to strike Filoso’s informal
reply brief.
2
PER CURIAM:
Phyllis Filoso appeals from the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer on her
claims alleging discriminatory treatment in violation of the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213
(2000), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
§ 2000e (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that Filoso
failed to establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination
under the ADA, see Tyndall v. Nat’l Educ. Cntrs., 31 F.3d 209, 212-
16 (4th Cir. 1994), or retaliation under Title VII, see Matvia v.
Bald Head Island Mgmt., Inc., 259 F.3d 261, 271 (4th Cir. 2001).
Accordingly, we affirm the award of summary judgment to the
Defendant. We deny Filoso’s motion for oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process. *
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --