The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1861•T. P. Crigler v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
03-1861Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 14, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1861
T. P. CRIGLER; NAJIEH R. CRIGLER,
Petitioners - Appellants,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 99-9233)
Submitted: December 19, 2003 Decided: January 14, 2004
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
T. P. Crigler and Najieh R. Crigler, Appellants Pro Se. Steven
Wesley Parks, Jonathan Samuel Cohen, John A. Nolet, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
T. P. Crigler and Najieh R. Crigler appeal from the tax
court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s determination of a
deficiency in their income taxes for the 1995 tax year and imposing
an accuracy-related penalty. We have reviewed the record and the
tax court’s memorandum and opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court.
See Crigler v. Comm’r, IRS, No. 99-9233 (U.S. Tax Ct. May 13,
2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.