The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1786•Elbert Hicks v. JAMES ROCHE, Secretary, Department of the Air Force
03-1786Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 10, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1786
ELBERT HICKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES ROCHE, Secretary, Department of the Air
Force,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-02-923-2)
Submitted: October 15, 2003 Decided: November 10, 2003
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elbert Hicks, Appellant Pro Se. Kent Pendleton Porter, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Elbert Hicks appeals the district court’s order granting
Defendant’s motion to dismiss his Title VII and age discrimination
action as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Hicks v. Roche, No. CA-02-923-2 (E.D. Va.
filed May 23, 2003 & entered May 27, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.