The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1765•Johnny Hilton-Bey v. UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE, Disclosure Document Program
03-1765Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 10, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1765
JOHNNY HILTON-BEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Disclosure Document Program,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-02-
4218-AMD, CA-03-1102-AMD)
Submitted: October 22, 2003 Decided: November 10, 2003
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnny Hilton-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Johnny Hilton-Bey (“Hilton”) appeals from the dismissal of his
civil action in which he alleged patent and trademark infringement
against the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The district
court dismissed Hilton’s claims without prejudice for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction. We have thoroughly reviewed the record
in this matter and conclude that we are without appellate
jurisdiction for the same reasons stated by the district court.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1)(2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.