The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1745•Evelyn Coulter v. United States of America
03-1745Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 22, 2004
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1745
EVELYN COULTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-02-1645)
Submitted: March 8, 2004 Decided: March 22, 2004
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ryan M. Mattson, HALE, HASSAN, CARLSON & PENN, PLC, Fairfax,
Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney,
Anita Claire Snyder, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Evelyn Coulter appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her Federal Tort Claims Act action for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Coulter v.
United States, No. CA-02-1645 (E.D. Va. Apr. 10, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.