DONALD SULLIVAN, Mr v. the United States Environmental Protection Agency

03-1688Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 14, 2003

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1688
DONALD SULLIVAN, Mr.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-187-F1-7)
Submitted: September 9, 2003 Decided: October 14, 2003
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Sullivan appeals the district court’s order dismissing,
for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Sullivan’s complaint
seeking declaratory judgment that the Environmental Protection
Agency does not have jurisdiction over his property pursuant to the
Clean Water Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Sullivan v. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, No. CA-02-187-F1-7 (E.D.N.C. May 8, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.