The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1618•Kurt Kasler v. CAROL HOWARD, Commissioner of Division of Motor Vehicles, North Carolina Department…
03-1618Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 16, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1618
KURT KASLER; LAURA KASLER, The People of North
Carolina, ex rel,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
CAROL HOWARD, Commissioner of Division of
Motor Vehicles, North Carolina Department of
Transportation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CA-03-46-3)
Submitted: October 9, 2003 Decided: October 16, 2003
Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kurt Kasler, Laura Kasler, Appellants Pro Se. Jeffrey Reid Edwards,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kurt and Laura Kasler appeal the district court’s judgment
granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismissing their
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Kasler v. Howard, No. CA-03-46-3 (W.D.N.C.
Apr. 17, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.