The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1584•Patricia Barnes v. Carolinas Medical Center
03-1584Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 29, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1584
PATRICIA BARNES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER; JAMES GREGORY; ENZO
HOOPER; PHOEBIA MOYER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CA-02-486-3-V)
Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 29, 2003
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Blakeney Meyer, Kimberly
Quade Cacheris, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Patricia Barnes appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her action alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Barnes v. Carolinas Med.
Ctr., No. CA-02-486-3-V (W.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.