The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1581•Phyllis King v. Town of Waynesville, d/b/a Waynesville Utilities, Town of Waynesville, North Carolina
03-1581Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 29, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1581
PHYLLIS KING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOWN OF WAYNESVILLE, d/b/a Waynesville
Utilities, Town of Waynesville, North
Carolina; A. LEE GALLOWAY, in his capacity as
Town Manager for the Town of Waynesville,
North Carolina and his sucessors, if any, in
that capacity; JOHN DOE, present or former
employee of the Town of Waynesville; JANE DOE,
present or former employee of the Town of
Waynesville,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CA-02-55-1-T)
Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 29, 2003
Before MICAHEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phyllis King, Apellant Pro Se. Frank G. Queen, BROWN, QUEEN &
PATTEN, P.A., Waynesville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Phyllis King appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her claims
under the Truth in Lending Act. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See King v. Town of Waynesville, No. CA-02-
55-1-T (W.D.N.C. filed Apr. 14, 2003 & entered Apr. 15, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.