Dana H. Fraction v. Bank of America Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1561
DANA H. FRACTION,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02-
4158-MJG)
Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: June 24, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dana H. Fraction, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Michael Topolski,
Elena Daly Marcuss, MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dana H. Fraction appeals the district court’s order dismissing
her second civil action in which she alleged wrongful termination
as precluded by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Fraction v. Bank of America Corp., No. CA-
02-4158-MJG (D. Md. Apr. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --