The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1530•William H. Wyatt, Jr v. MORRIS JONES, Colonial
03-1530Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 3, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1530
WILLIAM H. WYATT, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MORRIS JONES, Colonial; CITY OF PETERSBURG, a
Municipal Corporation organized under the laws
of the Commonwealth of Virginia; C. A. BRYANT,
Individually and in his capacity as an Officer
with the Petersburg Police Department; T. E.
INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS AN OFFICER
WITH THE PETERSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT;
DETECTIVE INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS
AN OFFICER OF THE PETERSBURG POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (CA-03-247-3)
Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 3, 2003
Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
William H. Wyatt, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
William H. Wyatt, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny Wyatt’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
See Wyatt v. Jones, No. CA-03-247-3 (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 18, 2003
& entered Mar. 19, 2003; Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.