The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1472•Harry E. Moore v. U.s. Steel Mining Co., Inc
03-1472Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 15, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1472
HARRY E. MOORE,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. STEEL MINING CO., INC.; DIRECTOR, OFFICE
OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
(BRB 02-0384-BLA, 98-BLA-00585)
Submitted: July 10, 2003 Decided: July 15, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry E. Moore, Petitioner Pro Se. Howard Gerald Salisbury, Jr.,
KAY, CASTO & CHANEY, Charleston, West Virginia; Rita A. Roppolo,
Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington,
D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Harry E. Moore seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and orders affirming the administrative law judge’s denial
of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000), and
denying reconsideration. Our review of the record discloses that
the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is
without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the Board. See Moore v. United States Steel Mining Co., No.
02-384-BLA; 98-BLA-00585 (BRB Mar. 12, 2003; Oct. 30, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.