The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1458•Dennis Bailey v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland
03-1458Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 3, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1458
DENNIS BAILEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge.
(CA-01-4044-H)
Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 3, 2003
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. William Davidson Evans, Jr.,
Senior Assistant County Attorney, Annapolis, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Bailey appeals the district court’s order granting Anne
Arundel County’s motion for summary judgment and denying relief on
his discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Bailey v. Anne Arundel County, No. CA-01-4044-
H (D. Md. Mar. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.