Judy Skinner v. Quintiles Transnational Corporation

03-1450Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 5, 2003

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1450
JUDY SKINNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
QUINTILES TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-01-1123)
Submitted: November 21, 2003 Decided: December 5, 2003
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Rizk, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Rosemary G.
Kenyon, Zebulon D. Anderson, Kathryn R. Valeika, SMITH, ANDERSON,
BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, L.L.P., Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Judy Skinner appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge granting summary judgment to
Defendant and dismissing Skinner’s action brought pursuant to the
American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2) (2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Skinner v.
Quintiles Transnational Corp., No. CA-02-1123 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 19,
2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.