The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1376•Michael T. Masuoka v. G. W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Employer
03-1376Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 5, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1376
MICHAEL T. MASUOKA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
G. W. MURPHY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
INCORPORATED, Employer; ARGONAUT INSURANCE
COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Insurance Carrier; 1-5
JOHN AND JANE DOES ENTITIES; 1-5 DOES
CORPORATION ENTITIES; 1-5 DOES PARTNERSHIP
ENTITIES; 1-5 JOHN AND JANE DOES; GOVERNMENTAL
ENTITIES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-02-1671-A)
Submitted: May 20, 2003 Decided: June 5, 2003
Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael T. Masuoka, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael T. Masuoka appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint as frivolous and for failure to
state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Masuoka v. G.W. Murphy Construction Co., No.
CA-02-1671-A (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 21, 2003 & entered Feb. 25,
2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.